Hasselblad
Hasselblad H3D-39II, Medium Format Digital SLR Camera with 39mp Sensor & 3" LCD Display.
(Electronics) Hasselblad
Integrated 22, 31 and 39 Mpix capture units with 3" display
Integrated CCD cooling sink for lower noise
Ultra-Focus: integral optimization of digital lens performance
Answers
Since I don't have $10,000 for a digital back, should I keep my 503cx and keep shooting film? I hate to sell it; it's like trading in a classic mustang for a focus. But I feel like I am the only one still shooting film.
Amy R,
I am still shooting medium and large format film.
Just bought some new Ektar 100 as a matter of fact.
Besides, suppose you were the last person using film, who cares? It's all about YOUR vision. If film works...so be it.
One last point, you do actually have a digital camera right now. I scan my medium format film with my Epson V500 and make digital files. It's cool. I end up with both a virus proof real negative AND a digital file. Film is the very best of both worlds!
.
The Hasselblad H3D is the world's first 48mm full-frame, large-sensor, medium-format DSLR camera system. The H3D has been developed around a ...
Whats the cheapest solution for putting a digital back on a hasselblad 500?
Is a low pixel count really an issue?
Looking at KEH.com, I see that they have a couple of Imacon Ixpress 16 MP backs available for right at $8000. These have, I believe, a 37mm square sensor.
There's also a Kodak back of about the same vintage and with about the same resolution that sells for the same price or maybe a little bit less.
I personally wouldn't get too terribly caught up on the megapixel rating. The obvious comparison to the above backs would be Canon's 1Ds MKII, at 16.7 megapixels and about the same price.
Although I haven't personally done the comparison, two things come to mind that would point in favor of the Imacon-
1. On the Imacon back, the same number of pixels are spread out over a greater area. This means that any given pixel on the Imacon back is going to be physically larger than in the Canon back. As you probably know, larger pixels are better able to grab light, and, thus, for a given sensitivity, will generally have a lot less noise. This means that the Imacon files should look a lot cleaner.
2. By all accounts, the 1Ds MkII is very taxing of the lenses in use, only achieving the top resolution when using excellent lenses mounted on a tripod and all the other usual precautions. Since the Imacon has a lower pixel density(about the same as that of a 5mp APS-C DSLR), it's going to be a lot less demanding of the lens in use, and therefore quite easy to get the full resolution out of. This should be especially true when using the excellent Carl Zeiss lenses on the Hasselblad.
As much striaght forward infomation as possible please.
Cheers.
100% digital. 39 megapixels. $34,000.00 US.
i'm thinking about purchasing a Hasselblad 500 elm, and wanted to know if they take Digital backs, and if so would it really be worth using that sort of equipment on a 500 elm?
any answers would be greatly appreciated;)
hey thanks for the advice, it's really helpful, I've already purchased the camera with accessories at what i think is a pretty great price, ($515AU) digital back or not, it's still a great piece of equipment to have at hand. thanks again!
You are going to have to go directly to Hasselblad for that answer. Over the past few decades the Hasselblad systems have changed just enough so not all backs are interchangeable.
I just got off the phone with a colleague who owns a studio and he told me that his has sold his old Hasselblad 39 digital camera system and gone to using Nikon D3x's in the studio. For him at least, this is a good move since he has been using Nikon DSLR's for location shoots and has a full compliment of lenses.
If you mean this one, you can buy it from Amazon
http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?i e=UTF8&location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ama zon.com%2FHasselblad-503cw-Medium-Format -Camera%2Fdp%2FB000V9ZB72%3Fie%3DUTF8%26 s%3Dphoto%26qid%3D1255838936%26sr%3D1-4& amp;tag=wii-world-20&linkCode=ur2&am p;camp=1789&creative=9325
Or you can check on their catalog
http://www.amazon.com/gp/search?ie=UTF8& amp;keywords=Hasselblad&tag=wii-worl d-20&index=photo&linkCode=ur2&am p;camp=1789&creative=9325
Hope this helps :)
Buy Cheap
Hasselblad H4D-40 Digital Camera [Expensive Swedish Digital Camera ...
”
Hasselblad includes True Focus technology that helps you deliver accurate composing at close distances. Instead of using an autofocus sensor like most SLRs, Hasselblad uses a yaw rate sensor that measures the angular velocity of the camera. All the data collected by the sensor is compiled by an on-board microprocessor, which then compensates via the camera’s lens motor. Pretty high-tech stuff, no doubt, and the microprocessor is doing this is all fast enough that no shutter lag is noticeable by the photographer.
The massive 40-megapixel sensor comes in at 33 x 44mm, which dpreview.com says is twice the size of a full-frame 35mm standard DSLR sensor). As you can imagine, such a camera will cost a great expensive, going on sale for $19,955. That includes the complete kit, which includes the camera, 80mm lens and viewfinder. The camera comes bundled with Hasselblad’s Phocus 2.0 software – a photography program like Adobe Lightroom.






PHASE ONE h25 digital back with Hasselblad 553ELX
Hasselblad 553ELX kit- digital ready- CB 60mm & A12
Adapter For Hasselblad V Back To Linhof M679 (Phase One Sinar Leaf Digital Back)
Hasselblad digital camera system